Social, cultural, economic and environmental context

Social, cultural, economic, and environmental challenges are interwoven. The World Heritage Convention The Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage is an international treaty adopted by the UN in 1972 that defines the kind of natural or cultural sites which can be considered for inscription on the World Heritage List for their Outstanding Universal Value for all humankind. Commonly known as the World Heritage Convention, it establishes how the international community as a whole is responsible for
the protection of such heritage and sets out the duties of States Parties in identifying potential sites that may be eligible for inscription onto the World Heritage List and their role in protecting and preserving them. By signing the Convention, each country pledges to conserve not only the sites situated on its territory that have been recognized as being of Outstanding Universal Value, but also to protect its national heritage and to be involved in international efforts to protect, conserve and promote the heritage of humankind. was based on the awareness that cultural and natural heritage were increasingly threatened with destruction not only by the traditional causes of decay, but also by changing social and economic conditions which aggravate the situation. Half a century later, human-induced climate change and biodiversity loss add to those pressures, with conflict, poverty, environmental degradation and
globalization. Economic challenges, limited priority-setting for heritage, and decision-making favouring exploitation of resources, in or around heritage places, significantly influence the ability of managers to protect heritage places. The displacement and dispossession of communities in the face of nonrecognition
of their rights adds complexity to these issues. Current challenges to heritage conservation require, more than ever, an in-depth understanding of the contexts of heritage places, since they will all be shaped by particular social, cultural, economic, and environmental dynamics. In order to identify, govern, conserve and manage heritage well, it is important to understand those dynamics and the positive and negative influences they can have, especially as the underlying causes of factors that can affect a heritage place.

Context will also deeply influence the ways in which the management system is structured and how it operates. When the context is understood in parallel with an assessment of the services and benefits flowing from the protection of the heritage place, it can provide additional insights that can strengthen management efforts. Although heritage managers most likely do not have the mandate or responsibility for issues within the context, when they work proactively with those in other sectors, they can gain greater results for heritage management and benefits for society (see 3.5).

The following sections indicate some of the contextual issues that affect many heritage places and their management and merit careful consideration. However, this needs to be tailored for each heritage place in order to understand the specific context in which it is located, which positive aspects can be taken advantage of and consolidated, which negative aspects require attention and where improvements might need to be made in order to strengthen the management system.

The approach to cultural and natural heritage conservation that depended on the protection of defined and bounded areas, monuments and sites has evolved over time to include landscape approaches and the recognition of the importance of their territorial contexts. Cultural heritage conservation is evolving from the conventional concept of protecting isolated monuments to considering the cultural significance of a wide variety of places, even large landscapes. Importance is being placed on integrating heritage conservation with urban and territorial planning systems, focusing on landscapes or larger territories and recognizing the dynamic relationship between people and heritage.

In the nature sector, changes in thinking about protected areas have emerged in part due to the growing importance of ensuring connectivity that can help to link habitats across whole landscapes, enabling species and their ecosystems to move or adapt as conditions change. Ecological connectivity is now more important than ever because of climate change, positioning protected areas in a practical sense within their larger ecosystems, interconnecting landscapes and seascapes. Protected areas are now more often viewed as part of a system and developed as networks. They may have diverse governance approaches and be integrated into the surrounding sustainably managed land delivering a wide range of services and benefits.

Plastic now makes up 80% of all marine debris that cause critical harm to marine species and to coastal areas which suffer enormous amounts of marine litter washing up on their shores. Increased globalization has also caused the rapid spread of invasive species to new areas , combined with changing weather patterns and rising temperatures, both of which are bringing about changes which prompt different approaches to the material conservation of heritage.

Climate change-related events are impacting both cultural and natural places at unprecedented levels, causing floods, droughts, heat waves, melting glaciers, sea level rise and ocean acidification. The frequency, intensity and timing of these events are also changing. While climate change is a global problem requiring collective action, its impacts are localized and vary from one place to the other. Although World Heritage All inherited assets which people value for reasons beyond mere utility. Heritage is a broad concept and includes shared legacies from the natural environment, the creations of humans and the creations and interactions between humans and nature. It encompasses built, terrestrial, freshwater and marine environments, landscapes and seascapes, biodiversity, geodiversity, collections, cultural practices, knowledge, living experiences, etc.   properties cannot be safeguarded from climate impact in isolation, they can make significant contributions to addressing this unprecedented global threat.

Conservation of heritage places is dependent on the degree to which different people and associated communities collectively support and care for those places. In many heritage places, Indigenous Peoples and local communities are still their everyday stewards. However, social trends can undermine the attachments and associations these communities hold for their heritage places and lead to neglect or loss of maintenance practices. For example, the increasing professionalization of the heritage sector and the consolidated role of government institutions in protecting and managing heritage places – and particularly World Heritage All inherited assets which people value for reasons beyond mere utility. Heritage is a broad concept and includes shared legacies from the natural environment, the creations of humans and the creations and interactions between humans and nature. It encompasses built, terrestrial, freshwater and marine environments, landscapes and seascapes, biodiversity, geodiversity, collections, cultural practices, knowledge, living experiences, etc.   properties, for which the state is ultimately responsible for – have sometimes undermined traditional practices and the roles that communities can play in the care of their own heritage.

Changing human demographics are among the most important social trends influencing heritage places but seldom receive the attention they deserve. As mobility increases worldwide, communities which were the holders of heritage values can change or move away, with the risk of diminishing the sense of place. Younger generations often move in search of better educational or economic opportunities. In some parts of the world, ageing populations raise concerns about the transmission of local and Indigenous knowledge, the continuation of cultural traditions, the progressive abandonment of agricultural landscapes and traditional human settlements, and the loss of know-how and craftsmanship needed to conserve built heritage. In other heritage places, growing populations can lead to increased pressures on scarce resources, human-wildlife conflicts, land-use change or encroachment (through agriculture or urban development), and the demolition of heritage-listed buildings to make way for higher-density buildings.

Meanings and associations with heritage places, and knowledge about them, need to be maintained if they are to be passed on to future generations. However, customary rules, uses and practices critical to the values and management of heritage places can slowly erode as they are influenced by social changes and alternative livelihoods that are less dependent on local resources.

Regrettably heritage management may also be isolated from the broader political context. For example, the heritage sector often operates without strong connections to other public administration sectors and development domains, even though policy decisions relating to economic growth, agriculture, energy, land use, housing, sanitation, water supply or transportation, can have deep and long-lasting effects. Heritage All inherited assets which people value for reasons beyond mere utility. Heritage is a broad concept and includes shared legacies from the natural environment, the creations of humans and the creations and interactions between humans and nature. It encompasses built, terrestrial, freshwater and marine environments, landscapes and seascapes, biodiversity, geodiversity, collections, cultural practices, knowledge, living experiences, etc.   management systems need to adopt models of governance that promote collaboration with other sectors and strengthen the integration of legal and planning instruments at broader scales.

Economic resources are needed to ensure adequate protection, conservation, and management of heritage places. As for the other contextual dynamics, economic trends can profoundly influence the types of change and developments proposed in and around heritage places.

Communities have aspirations to improve their quality of life, particularly where there are people living in poverty. Pursuing short-term economic benefits can compromise sustainable development and long-term benefits to wider groups of people as well as future generations. In all cases, income-generating activities are important for the heritage place and the local economy, but these need to be accompanied by an awareness of their compatibility with the management objectives defined for the heritage place (see 2.3). In some circumstances, diminishing public budgets can lead to expedient decisions that are detrimental to the conservation of the heritage place, for example, ambitious and inappropriate tourism strategies, destructive exploitation of natural resources, or large-scale infrastructure projects. In some cases where extractive industries, large scale dam and hydro developments, cable cars and transportation infrastructure projects such as highways and bridges were proposed in or near World Heritage properties, the World Heritage Committee has made clear decisions that such activities should not take place because of their negative impacts on the OUV. There are also a growing number of instances where industries have themselves made pledges to totally avoid certain activities within World Heritage properties. In some cases, significant and inappropriate developments have resulted in the removal of properties from the World Heritage List.

Heritage professionals often do not have the mandate or necessary power to address these issues directly; but by being aware of them they can anticipate problems derived from certain economic trends and others that can potentially affect the heritage places if not monitored or left unaddressed. Solutions to such problems almost always depend on more collaboration with actors from other sectors and on better integration of management planning instruments at different scales.

States Parties The countries which have adhered to the Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage ( World Heritage Convention The Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage is an international treaty adopted by the UN in 1972 that defines the kind of natural or cultural sites which can be considered for inscription on the World Heritage List for their Outstanding Universal Value for all humankind. Commonly known as the World Heritage Convention, it establishes how the international community as a whole is responsible for
the protection of such heritage and sets out the duties of States Parties in identifying potential sites that may be eligible for inscription onto the World Heritage List and their role in protecting and preserving them. By signing the Convention, each country pledges to conserve not only the sites situated on its territory that have been recognized as being of Outstanding Universal Value, but also to protect its national heritage and to be involved in international efforts to protect, conserve and promote the heritage of humankind. ) (UNESCO, 1972). to the World Heritage Convention The Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage is an international treaty adopted by the UN in 1972 that defines the kind of natural or cultural sites which can be considered for inscription on the World Heritage List for their Outstanding Universal Value for all humankind. Commonly known as the World Heritage Convention, it establishes how the international community as a whole is responsible for
the protection of such heritage and sets out the duties of States Parties in identifying potential sites that may be eligible for inscription onto the World Heritage List and their role in protecting and preserving them. By signing the Convention, each country pledges to conserve not only the sites situated on its territory that have been recognized as being of Outstanding Universal Value, but also to protect its national heritage and to be involved in international efforts to protect, conserve and promote the heritage of humankind. commit to ensuring that heritage plays a function in the life of communities, and when this happens, public and private investment in its conservation is more likely to occur. If heritage conservation is integrated into sustainable development agendas, both aspects can be complementary rather than conflictual. Development can take many potential pathways; it is a matter of reflecting on which are appropriate, more sustainable, and bring better outcomes to both heritage and people. For World Heritage properties, the Policy for the Integration of a Sustainable Development Perspective into the Processes of the World Heritage Convention The Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage is an international treaty adopted by the UN in 1972 that defines the kind of natural or cultural sites which can be considered for inscription on the World Heritage List for their Outstanding Universal Value for all humankind. Commonly known as the World Heritage Convention, it establishes how the international community as a whole is responsible for
the protection of such heritage and sets out the duties of States Parties in identifying potential sites that may be eligible for inscription onto the World Heritage List and their role in protecting and preserving them. By signing the Convention, each country pledges to conserve not only the sites situated on its territory that have been recognized as being of Outstanding Universal Value, but also to protect its national heritage and to be involved in international efforts to protect, conserve and promote the heritage of humankind. recognizes their inherent potential to contribute to all dimensions of sustainable development and works to harness the collective benefits for society; however, their OUV should not be compromised as a result (paragraph 4, p. 2).

Heritage conservation is often viewed as an obstacle to economic development, perhaps due to the perception that it hinders change. A thorough understanding of heritage values and attributes can help to identify the limits of acceptable change. In this way, rather than positioning change merely as either negative or positive, the question can be asked about what type, pace and degree of change is appropriate for that particular place in relation to its heritage values and for associated communities.

Trying to understand the social, economic, cultural and environmental context of heritage places is not beyond the scope of heritage conservation: it is a necessity. Heritage practitioners are not responsible for the decisions made in other sectors but should always be proactive and take part in decision-making processes that may affect World Heritage properties so that their concerns can be fully reflected in those decisions, and in order to prevent or mitigate the impacts such decisions may have.